Tiger, Tiger, Burning Bright

by John Shore on December 12, 2009 · 13 comments

TIGER, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder and what art
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand and what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? What dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And water’d heaven with their tears,
Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?

Tiger, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?

The Tiger, by William Blake. 1757–1827

**********************************************************************************************************
Follow: http://twitter.com/johnshore
Befriend: http://www.facebook.com/john.shore1
Be Fan: http://www.facebook.com/pages/John-Shore/89494795412?ref=s


 

11prayerofweek
Subscribe to John’s Prayer for the Week and/or John’s Monthly Newsletter here. (Read a bit more about them here).

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

odnikkijamest4 June 16, 2011 at 5:21 am

Top class webpage sincerely, Aubrey Bailly

Reply

Elizabeth Fullerton May 22, 2010 at 3:54 pm

John,
Really love your work so far, but you're wrong about Blake. Saw his paintings shown in Oxford and at the Met in NYC. Maybe not "polished", but transcendent. And meaty. And daring. You might want to give them another chance.
FYI: I like his poetry, too, but I would't defend it as "all that." My tastes run more to the moderns or, oddly, the Victorians.

Reply

John Shore May 22, 2010 at 9:17 pm

I'm wrong about the fact that I don't like Blake's painting? Oh. How weird. I thought I felt that way.

Reply

Elizabeth Fullerton May 22, 2010 at 3:47 pm

John,
Really love your work so far, but you're wrong about Blake. Saw his paintings shown in Oxford and at the Met in NYC. Maybe not "polished", but transcendent. You might want to give them another chance.
FYI: I like his poetry, too, but I would't defend it as "all that."

Reply

Tim December 13, 2009 at 11:40 pm

@Greta

Thanks. You are right, sister. Maybe some day the good shepherd will finally lead me to that point in my path where my responses will be less my own, and more His. I am a work in progress. As for "good people" coming around the Woods family, Luke 18:19 would instead have me praying that Christ alone would be their rock and fortress. The very people we might be tempted to label "good" simply by virtue of their status in Jesus, could end up being no more helpful than myself. : )

Reply

Greta Sheppard December 13, 2009 at 12:33 pm

John and Tim, it's the whole idea of having 'fun at someone else's expence'.

My nature instead would be to encourage the man as he attempts to fix what he has broken…

My prayer for Tiger and his wife is for trust to be reborn…that good people will come around the family…that he gets appropriate help for his 'addiction'.

Bless you both, John and Tim!

Reply

John Shore December 13, 2009 at 4:15 am

I LOVE (most of the work of) the Romantic-era poets. But for the life of me, I can't understand why William Blake is famous. To my mind, he's about as good a poet as he is painter.

Reply

texastee December 13, 2009 at 4:13 am

When the Tiger mess first hit the fan, those were the first words that came to mind, and I've never been much of William Blake fan. I was one of those English majors that just endured the romantics and moved on.

Reply

Tim December 13, 2009 at 2:36 am

@Greta—

If the tables turn on me

I'll surely laugh and slap my knee

For just shy of two years ago

My wife left me for worker "co"

So try to understand my poke

I think unfaithfulness no joke

So if my judgment seem to drastic

You're probably right, I am bombastic

Have a blest week.

Reply

John Shore December 12, 2009 at 1:27 pm

Whoa, Tim. That was pretty fully awesome. NICE.

Red: FUNNY!

Greta: But surely you liked Tim's poem a LITTLE? Quite extremely well done, didn't you think?

Reply

Greta Sheppard December 12, 2009 at 1:23 pm

Oh ye poets, wist thee not,

that those who judge, poking fun a lot,

will soon be found in that same spot.

The tables will turn and you will be the one they laugh at gleefuly.

Words , like chickens, come home to roost . . .

so stay your tongue…give yourself a boost.

greta sheppard/2009 /12/12/

Reply

Redlefty (Michael) December 12, 2009 at 12:32 pm

You know that else burns?

Chalmydia.

So I've heard, anyway.

Not sure if that's exactly how Tiger was burning but it seems probable.

Reply

Tim December 12, 2009 at 12:07 pm

Tiger, Tiger, beat to hell

Swollen bumps and torn lapel,

What teutonic Nordegren

Has the strength of many men?

Prone aside yon Escalade

Knocked out cold by wife betrayed

Neighbour dialing 9-1-1

Tiger's nightmare has begun

And what vacant toothy smile

Betrays a heart so rich with guile?

And when thy wife began to beat,

What savaged limbs O' famous cheat?

What the reason? what the frick?

Wast thou thinking with thy prick?

What the nine-iron in wife's grip

Interrupts thine ego-trip?

When the FOX and CNN

Bore the tale to thy chagrin

Didst I chuckle deep below?

Yea I did, and ever so

Tiger, Tiger beat to hell

To the game ye bid farewell

What teutonic Nordegren

Has your focus once again?

Tiger, by Tim Arnold. 1954—

Apologies to William Blake

Reply

Leave a Comment