Wings on a Pig

by John Shore on October 1, 2010 in Christian Issues · 871 comments

These days, every Christian who is “against homosexuality” (whatever in the name of Monstro’s blowhole that actually means) presents the same argument. That argument is … well, this, taken directly from an email sent me this morning:

Would you support a serial adulterer who loves his wife, but is just attracted to other women because that’s who he is and how he was born?  How about an alcoholic who just can’t help himself? Would you support him as he leaves his wife for alcohol? A glutton? A man of extreme pride? Why does homosexuality get a pass, and not any other sin? A person with homosexual desires who resists temptation is exactly the same as a married man who resists temptation to carry on affairs with other women — which is to say, a human being battling the temptation to sin. The most compassionate thing that we could tell someone struggling with homosexuality (or any other sin for that matter) is to keep resisting temptation. Keep battling. Don’t give in. This is your badge as a Christian, that you fight temptation.

Um … for the record, I do not make this stuff up.

By “these days,” I mean that the typical Christian argument against homosexuality has changed. It used to be, “Gays are really only messed-up straight people. They should let Jesus make them straight, so that they can stop acting all gay and not go to hell.”

Nowadays, the Christian refrain isn’t, “Stop being gay.” Now it’s “Stop acting gay.” They’ve given up trying to argue that gays can change their sexual orientation: the complete failure of Christian Fix-a-Gay and Homo No’ Mo! programs — not to mention a universe of anecdotal and empirical evidence — have left them little choice in that.

So they’ve changed their approach. Now their argument is that a homosexual struggling against the temptation to act homosexual is no different from anyone else struggling to resist a sinful temptation.

Christians love this new argument. If I’ve heard it once, I’ve heard it ten thousand times. We all have. You whisper “gay” into the ear of a sleeping Christian, and there’s an excellent chance they’ll just start saying it in their sleep. “Just like any other sinful temptation. We’re all sinners. Must resist.”

And putting your brain to sleep before you say that is the very best way to say it, too. Because it could only make sense to a brain-dead person. It’s just too stupid for words.

But lemme try to find some words anyway.

Virtually all sins share a crucial, defining, common quality. Because that quality, which is present in every other imaginable sin, is utterly missing from being or acting gay, insisting on putting homosexuality into the same category as every other sin — or in the category of sin at all — is like gluing wings on a pig, and insisting the result belongs in the category of “bird.” It doesn’t. It can’t. It won’t. Ever.

Here is that Big Difference between homosexuality and all those activities generally understood to be “sinful”: There is no sin I can commit that, by virtue of committing it, renders me incapable of loving or being loved. I can commit murder. I can steal. I can rob. I can rape. I can drink myself to death. I can do any terrible thing at all — and no one would ever claim that intrinsic to the condition that gave rise to my doing that terrible thing is that I am, by nature, simply incapable of giving or receiving love.

No one tells the chronic drinker, or glutton, or adulterer, or any other kind of sinner, to stop experiencing love. Yet that’s exactly what so many Christians are insisting that gay people do.

When you tell a gay person to “resist” being gay, what you are really telling them — what you really mean — is for them to be celibate.

What you are truly and actually saying is that you want them to condemn themselves to a life devoid of the kind of enduring, romantic, partner-to-partner love that all people, Christians included, understand as just about the best part of being alive.

Be alone, you’re demanding. Live alone. Don’t hold anyone’s hand. Don’t snuggle on your couch with anyone. Don’t cuddle up with anyone at  night before you fall asleep. Don’t have anyone to chat with over coffee in the morning.

Do not bind your life to that of another. Live your whole life without knowing that joy, that sharing, that peace.

Just say “no” to love.

Be alone. Live alone. Die alone.

The “sinful temptation” that Christians are forever urging LGBT people to resist is love.

Being, of course, the one thing Jesus was most clear about wanting his followers to extend to others.

 

This essay is taken from my book:



Just out: UNFAIR: Why the “Christian” View of Gays Doesn’t Work (softcover edition; Kindle edition; NookBook edition). You’re invited to check out my Facebook page, and my group Unfundamentalist Christians, the motto of which is “Above all, love.”

{ 871 comments… read them below or add one }

Freya Spencer via Facebook January 12, 2012 at 9:04 am

I’m with Jennifer!

Reply

Kelly Lynn Mosher via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 6:39 pm

I didn’t say it, GOD DOES.

Reply

Christina Johnson January 12, 2012 at 6:02 am

How do you mean? Please elaborate.

Reply

Anthony Venn-Brown January 11, 2012 at 4:56 pm

excellent article……..you might like mine of a similar vein

http://gayambassador.blogspot.com/2011/10/normal-0-false-false-false-en-au-x-none.html

Reply

Jennifer Sandberg January 11, 2012 at 4:31 pm

Let’s turn this argument completely around: what if heterosexuality was considered a sin: so all those “Christians” would then say: Just resist being attracted to members of the opposite sex. Maybe THEN they would start to understand. Or….maybe not.

Reply

Jennifer Edwards via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 3:14 pm

You are so amazing at putting into words exactly what I believe!

Reply

Susy Crandall via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 3:12 pm

However if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and acts like a duck, it’s probably a homophobe. And that is a sin.

Reply

Stephanie January 11, 2012 at 2:48 pm

John, I appreciate all you do to make the name of Jesus famous. I still don’t understand, though, why people argue homosexuality or any other matter from a legal perspective. We are not Jews. All things are lawful (but to each individual, some things are not beneficial). Christians must follow the Spirit dwelling in our hearts. If the Spirit leads one to be in love with someone or to smoke hashish or to run a stop sign, it is sin to disobey him. So if one feels conviction to have a homosexual relationship, thank God for him or her, for that person does the will of God. Who knows how many might be saved from perishing because of that person’s obedience to the Giver of Law? We are rightly judged by no one. We are not Jews.

Reply

Kenny Dozhier via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:59 pm

And something I know I’ll obsess over for months!

Reply

Kenny Dozhier via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:57 pm

Sir, I salute you. You gave us THE defining argument on this matter.

Reply

Mad Maddie Mendelsson via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:48 pm

John Shore, you’re arguments are alway well thought-out and intellectually delivered.

Reply

Brian Davis via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:41 pm

A strong rhetorical point. I find it more satisfying to argue what constitutes a sin than whether a particular act is automatically sinful. I have been able to get a few Fundies to see that it is context not the act intrinsically. You find a flaw and use it to change a mind once in a while.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post in Christian Issues:

Next post in Christian Issues: