Wings on a Pig

by John Shore on October 1, 2010 in Christian Issues · 885 comments

Once upon a time the evangelical Christian’s typical response to homosexuality was that gay people are just messed up straight people who need to become better Christians so that God can stop them from being gay.

The complete failure of the “pray away the gay” movement, however, in conjunction with endless evidence that people are simply born gay, has succeeded in finally tossing that hoary argument onto the ash heap of history. But has that stopped evangelicals from arguing against homosexuality? Of course not. They just needed a new argument, is all.

And they found one. Today the Christian argument against gay people is typically … well, this, taken from an email recently sent me:

Would you support a serial adulterer who leaves his wife, but is just attracted to other women, because that’s who he is and how he was born?  How about an alcoholic who just can’t help himself? Would you support him as he leaves his wife for alcohol? Would you support a glutton? A man of extreme pride? Why does homosexuality get a pass, and not any other sin?

A person with homosexual desires who resists temptation is exactly the same as a married man who resists temptation to carry on affairs with other women—which is to say, a human being battling the temptation to sin. The most compassionate thing that we could tell someone struggling with homosexuality (or any other sin for that matter) is to keep resisting temptation. Keep battling. Don’t give in. This is your badge as a Christian, that you fight temptation.

Now the argument is that a gay person struggling against the temptation to be who they really are is no different from anyone else struggling to resist a “sinful” temptation. Now, in other words, the refrain isn’t that gay people should stop being gay. Now it’s that they should stop acting gay.

Evangelicals are positively enamored of this new argument. If I’ve heard it once, I’ve heard it ten thousand times. We all have. You whisper “gay” into the ear of a sleeping evangelical, and there’s an excellent chance that he or she will start murmuring in their sleep, “Just like any other sinful temptation. We’re all sinners. Must resist temptation.”

And putting your brain to sleep before you say that is the very best way to say it, too. Because it’s an argument that could only make sense to a brain-dead person. It’s just too lame for words.

But lemme try to find some words anyway.

Virtually all sins share a crucial, defining, common quality. Because that quality, which is present in every other imaginable sin, is utterly absent from being or acting gay, insisting upon putting homosexuality into the same category as every other sin—or in the category of sin at all—is like gluing wings on a pig, and insisting that the result belongs in the category of “bird.” It doesn’t. It can’t. It won’t. Ever.

Here is that Big Difference between homosexuality and all those other activities generally understood to be “sinful”: There is no sin I can commit that, by virtue of my having committed it, renders me incapable of loving or being loved. I can commit murder. I can steal. I can rob. I can rape. I can drink myself to death. I can do any terrible thing at all, and no one would ever claim that intrinsic to the condition that gave rise to my doing that terrible thing is that I am, by nature, unqualified for giving or receiving love.

No one tells the chronic drinker, glutton, adulterer, gambler, or any other kind of sinner that having committed their sin—that being the way they are—means they must stop experiencing love.

Yet living without love is exactly what anti-gay Christians insist upon for gay people.

When you tell a gay person to “resist” being gay, what you are really telling them—what you really mean—is for them to be celibate. It’s okay for them to be gay; they just can’t live out their gayness.

What you mean is that you want them to condemn themselves to a life absolutely devoid of the kind of the romantic, long-term, emotionally and physically intimate love that all people, Christians included, understand not only as their birthright, but as just about the greatest part of being human.

Be alone, you’re demanding. Live alone. Don’t hold anyone’s hand. Don’t snuggle on your couch with anyone. Don’t cuddle up with anyone at night before you fall asleep. Don’t have anyone at your table to chat with over coffee in the morning.

Don’t have or raise children.

Don’t get married. Live your whole life without knowing that joy, that sharing, that fulfillment.

Be alone. Live alone. Die alone.

The “sinful temptation” that Christians are forever urging LGBT people to resist is love.

Now isn’t that funny, given that love is the one thing that Jesus was most clear about wanting his followers to extend to others? It’s just so funny it makes you want to laugh till you cry.


 

11prayerofweek
Subscribe to John’s Prayer for the Week and/or John’s Monthly Newsletter here. (Read a bit more about them here).

{ 885 comments… read them below or add one }

1 3 4 5

John Shore via Facebook October 1, 2012 at 1:17 pm

I’d hate to be the person who’s job it is to get everyone on board with being celibate.

Reply

Cynthia Anne Womack via Facebook October 1, 2012 at 12:53 pm

There’s this simmering idea that EVERYone should be celibate. You’d be surprised at the number of people who think ‘carnal relations’ are something we got stuck with after Eve had (s-e-x) with the devil. Gay men are ‘bad enough’ but *women* aren’t supposed to like intercourse at all. Normal females endure the physical aspect of marriage in order to accomodate the fleshly weakness of their husbands or to have children. Homosexuals are as unnerving as those people who read books,eat vegetables or go to church of their own free will.

Reply

Eliot Parulidae via Facebook October 1, 2012 at 12:25 pm

This one gave my uncle pause. Some people are cruel, of course, but others simply don’t think very far ahead.

Reply

Michael March 24, 2012 at 5:17 pm

I find that there is one fundamental flaw with this chain of reasoning you have presented in the “Wings on a Pig” article from the Oct 1 issue of Christian Issues.

You have equated love with sex. No, you didn’t say it right out, but that’s really the only thing wrong with homosexuality. A man can love another man, and a woman can love another woman. In fact, a married man can love other women, but he can’t have sex with them. Sex is not love.

Love is patient, love is kind… and on it goes in the 13th chapter of 1st Corinthians. A man can experience love for another man without the lust.

Reply

DR March 24, 2012 at 5:51 pm

This is the most ridiculous argument. A marriage is not a marriage without intended sex. Come on.

Reply

Glynis July 23, 2012 at 9:29 pm

DR, Hang him for what he said, if you can. But he is not guilty of what he didn’t say. He never mentioned marriage, not in the context of which you are accusing him. You’re comment is therefore abusive (calling it ridiculous – which is name-calling) and an invalid argument. The “Come on” part is again, a form of verbal abuse, since is is ridicule or sarcasm.

Reply

TheIntellectualGerbil July 12, 2012 at 8:45 am

i’d like to point out two things, that may help you understand what i think john meant:

1. physical intimacy is pretty worthless without emotional intimacy. everyone can masturbate to get this “itch scratched”. (sorry if this is to graphic)

2. a gay man or lesbian woman does not fall in love with a member of the opposite sex. there is a significant difference between love as a friend and love as a partner.

also i would like to tell you a personal story:

i was raised in a conservative christian household so i do get where people are coming from, i walked that road myslef. well i also happen to be gay and this is how i experienced what i think john described.

yes you can build a close friendship and as a gay man you can love a woman. physical intimacy is not a problem either, all the parts work just fine all you need is discipline – but there the problem starts, love should not require discipline to “endure” it.

i had several relationships (relationship for me = lasting at least 1 year) with women from 16 until i was 20 and just could no longer pretend, because it was killing me. can you imagine how much it takes to keep up a wall 24/7? the only times i was myself was in the middle of the night when everyone else was asleep and i was free to break down into that frightened young man that was me, terrified that the next day someone could find out who i really am.

i prayed like crazy for years and i don’t even want to remember the number of times i cried myself to sleep because i just could not change who i was.

don’t get me wrong, i dearly loved the women i was with, but i never ever desired them as a partner, neither emotionally nor physically. this is what was missing and it is the crucial essence that binds two people together in a relationship of that kind. when i was with my girlfriend that bond just was not there and try as i might i could not forge it.

now, i am sure you remember what it is like to fall in love with a woman as a straight man (guessing based on your nick). imagine having several relationships with really wonderful people but always feeling empty inside. that feeling you have when you fall in love with a woman just is not there. would you want that?

now imagine how it was for me, after i accepted who i was, meeting my first boyfriend and really falling in love for the first time when i was 20 years old. the whole shabang, butterflies, my emotions all over the place, grinning like a fool all day long. dating, talking, flirting and everything finally just feels right.

when i woke up in my boyfriends arms for the first time i cried out of sheer joy because this felt like i was home. sorry i have no other words for it.

i am in my mid thirties now and with my partner of 12 years in a commited relationship. the most important things for me are, were and always will be waking up in that mans arms, watching him sleep at night, kissing him good buy when we go to work.

no human being can be happy without the possibility to experience this kind of emotional bond, but that is it what some christians expect homosexuals to do.

god blessed me with love, it may be different than yours, but it still is pure and true love, not just physical attraction. if being gay is a sin, than me and my husband will burn in hell together and i would not want it any other way, because wherever this man goes my heart, body and soul will follow.

p.s.: sorry for all lower-case i am seriously dyslexic. my brain considers punctuation a game of chance and if i even try to play with upper case i usually end up all over the place …

Reply

Diana A. July 12, 2012 at 4:12 pm

Thank you. What you’ve written is beautiful.

Reply

Bevie October 1, 2012 at 3:41 pm

Thank you for writing this. I am seriously in tears and my heart is both sorrowful (for your pain in the past) and singing (for your joy with having found your true love) at the same time.

Reply

Phillip February 29, 2012 at 9:35 pm

Hey John Shore!!

Hey bro, thanks for your blog, I’ve found a lot of good reading here. I think you are very sincere in your writings and I appreciate the passion you put into it. Sigh… but I’m torn with the content of this blog, particularly the last 18 lines or so (lol.. yes, I counted).

If you asked 1,000 men, “Who do you love the most?” And maybe, “Who loves you the most… even unconditionally?” Or, “If you hit the lottery, who would you spend money on first?” I wonder what the majority of them would say… Their girlfriend(s), boyfriend(s), wife, husband, daughter, son, mom, dad, granny…

Rather than suggest which I think the most common answer would be, I’ll only assert that, whichever the most common answer is, I bet you that the answer, from most guys (and gals), would not be largely informed by… eros (sexual love or desire).

For so many of us, the person we love the most is not the person(s) we have experienced eros love with- I’d bet you, John Sore, $100 that this category of person falls 3rd or even lower on the list.

The ONLY point I’m making in this long comment is that to resist sexual desire or relationships is not to resist love. It doesn’t mean to live and die alone. It doesn’t mean that you will have a lesser existance or deprived loveless life! To reduce love to this level of experience is… well… I’ll just say that I’m just sorry so many of us honestly can reduce love to this… As I’ve experienced love so great that any romantic desire or relationship has paled in comparison.

This is not to say the love between a couple isn’t the most passionate and powerfully intimate love many experience, but it is to say that there is even more! to love. More to life than that. Consider the words of Jesus when speaking about eunuchs in Matthew, or the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians and other books. I isn’t even God’s intention that we all amrry… are the rest to live lives devoid of life and love!! Absolutely not!!

I’m done, for now, John Shore. And I’ve got that $100 set aside. Did you even right the last 18 lines of this blog? Doesn’t seem like your style! Just kinda… or wholly off, i thought… and you’re usually on point.

Best Regards to you, John Shore!

Phil or Phillip Watson, if you prefer… lol

Reply

Phillip February 29, 2012 at 9:37 pm

my friends are gonna get on mr for the errors… especially that “right” in the last paragraph… oh the shame…

Reply

Phillip February 29, 2012 at 9:40 pm

It is very late and I’ve slept 5 hours in the last 2 days… And my typos- or the embarassment- will probably keep me up another night… I wish we could edit comments….. Thanks again for such great articles/blogs, John Shore.

Phillip

Reply

Allie June 1, 2012 at 1:13 am

Love… ur doin it rong.

If your spouse isn’t 1st on the list, I feel deeply sorry for you.

Reply

Phillip June 21, 2012 at 11:24 pm

Allie, I guess most of us are doing it wrong. Fewer and fewer people are getting married and divorce rates are rising quickly… I, like you, feel deeply sorry for the state of marriage in the western world.

Nonetheless, i really wanted to contrast PASSION and LOVE. I think most marry for passion and compatibility rather that the sacrificial love that Christ exhibits; the love that never fails… the patient, kind and long-suffering kind love that puts others before itself. The love that would face death for anther. This love can be experienced and shared with no romantic/sexual expression. Like the love I share with my immediate family.

I hope to share the SAME pure and powerful love with my spouse one day- in addition to passionate romance… I just wish more people had the same desire. We confuse passion for love and sorta glorify ourselves and our romantic expressions of something so much more deep and powerful than our “enduring, romantic, partner-to-partner love.” Love is eternal. It’s so much bigger than our emotions and romantic desires.

A celibate life, is a FAR CRY from a loveless life.

I’m 26 years celibate, yet overwhelmed with love.

Reply

Freya Spencer via Facebook January 12, 2012 at 9:04 am

I’m with Jennifer!

Reply

Kelly Lynn Mosher via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 6:39 pm

I didn’t say it, GOD DOES.

Reply

Christina Johnson January 12, 2012 at 6:02 am

How do you mean? Please elaborate.

Reply

Anthony Venn-Brown January 11, 2012 at 4:56 pm

excellent article……..you might like mine of a similar vein

http://gayambassador.blogspot.com/2011/10/normal-0-false-false-false-en-au-x-none.html

Reply

Jennifer Sandberg January 11, 2012 at 4:31 pm

Let’s turn this argument completely around: what if heterosexuality was considered a sin: so all those “Christians” would then say: Just resist being attracted to members of the opposite sex. Maybe THEN they would start to understand. Or….maybe not.

Reply

Jennifer Edwards via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 3:14 pm

You are so amazing at putting into words exactly what I believe!

Reply

Susy Crandall via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 3:12 pm

However if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and acts like a duck, it’s probably a homophobe. And that is a sin.

Reply

Stephanie January 11, 2012 at 2:48 pm

John, I appreciate all you do to make the name of Jesus famous. I still don’t understand, though, why people argue homosexuality or any other matter from a legal perspective. We are not Jews. All things are lawful (but to each individual, some things are not beneficial). Christians must follow the Spirit dwelling in our hearts. If the Spirit leads one to be in love with someone or to smoke hashish or to run a stop sign, it is sin to disobey him. So if one feels conviction to have a homosexual relationship, thank God for him or her, for that person does the will of God. Who knows how many might be saved from perishing because of that person’s obedience to the Giver of Law? We are rightly judged by no one. We are not Jews.

Reply

Kenny Dozhier via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:59 pm

And something I know I’ll obsess over for months!

Reply

Kenny Dozhier via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:57 pm

Sir, I salute you. You gave us THE defining argument on this matter.

Reply

Mad Maddie Mendelsson via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:48 pm

John Shore, you’re arguments are alway well thought-out and intellectually delivered.

Reply

Brian Davis via Facebook January 11, 2012 at 1:41 pm

A strong rhetorical point. I find it more satisfying to argue what constitutes a sin than whether a particular act is automatically sinful. I have been able to get a few Fundies to see that it is context not the act intrinsically. You find a flaw and use it to change a mind once in a while.

Reply

1 3 4 5

Leave a Comment

Previous post in Christian Issues:

Next post in Christian Issues: