
What fuels the fiery hatred that so many Christians and others harbor for gays can’t be explained by pointing to the Bible alone. Clearly something more visceral is being triggered there.
And for so many people, that something is everything.
When you hear the word homosexual, what’s the first thing that comes to mind? A gay man. It’s always a gay man. It’s gay men that get people out on the streets waving signs and screaming. It’s gay men about whom people tend to get so impassioned. It’s gay men toward whom all the hate and anger is directed.
Zillions of people are a long way from being okay with lesbians; I don’t mean to in any way minimize the bigotry against which lesbians constantly struggle. But generally—on an instinctual, immediate level—the lion’s share of the rabid anti-gay energy is focused upon “fags.”
And so that becomes the $83 million question (which is how much total was spent to promote and pass California’s Proposition 8): Why are so many people as reactive to gay men as they are? What is it about them, really, that they just hate so much?
And the answer to that question is simple: Gay men threaten the traditional power base of straight men.
Here’s the basic run of it inside the brain/heart/subconscious of a typical straight man:
I may not be much. But I’m a man. And that entitles me to a lot.
Two women together? That’s kind of cute—sexy, even. But it doesn’t scare me. Because neither of those women can threaten my power. They can’t undermine the truth that, as a man, I’m still (figuratively and literally) on top. Two women together doesn’t change the fact that this is still a man’s world.
But two men together? Yikes. That’s a problem for me. That’s when all the walls in my world begin to crumble.
A man who is gay is essentially my equal, my peer: he’s one of my kind. If it’s okay for him to be romantic with another man, then, for me, everything gets seriously thrown out of whack. Because where the heck does that leave me?
I’m a man. I get to be a man. That means I’m … the man! I’m in charge. I’m at the head of the table. I make the money. I have the muscles. I build the castles. I’m number one! But I can’t be number one without people below me to be number one over. No true boss doesn’t have subordinates. My whole organization—my entire power structure, everything that keeps me being The Man—absolutely, 100% depends upon me—and, by extension, upon my kind—being in charge.
And what we’re in charge of is women.
Muscles. Castles. Food on the table. Conquering hero.
Swinger of clubs. Thruster of weapons.
Head of household.
That’s how it’s been. That’s how it’s supposed to be. That’s my goddamn right as a man. And if you try to take that from me, I will do everything in my power to make sure that you fail.
If men start loving men, then how can I dominate those men?
Men loving men takes away my power. It removes my power; it eliminates the place where I’m designed to exercise my power.
Gay men screw with the basis of my existence. And I will see them in hell before I’ll sit back and just let that happen.
And that’s how that goes.
That’s how that’s always gone.
And it’s hardly men alone who have invested their all into the traditional patriarchal power hierarchy. There’s much in that power structure that has always worked for women, too.
The traditional power hierarchy is traditional for a reason. Men are stronger than women. Traditionally the did have to go out and hunt, and chop down trees, and build homes. Women did have to stay home and have the babies. That’s how our species grew.
Gender matters. It’s real. And it’s sure mattered in the past.
But today? When meat’s for sale at any grocery store, and most guys wouldn’t know an ax from a fax? When women can tap a keypad with the best of ‘em? When it’s brains that matter, and not brawn at all? When the winner is the one who is the most creative, the quickest to adapt—the one who’s best at relationships?
Today, the ground beneath the personal politics and power of gender is shaking like a California earthquake.
And grabbing onto your Bible won’t stop that movement. Nothing can.
Men are going to kiss men. And that will always seem intensely weird to straight people—just like men and women kissing will always seem intensely weird to gay people.
It’s a new world. And it’s time to be brave about it.
And mostly, of course, it’s time to realize that when it comes to men loving men and women loving women, straight people have nothing—nothing—to fear but fear itself.

















{ 287 comments… read them below or add one }
« 1 2 3
One small further point; what do I do, as a straight man, with the idea that another guy I knew, as far as I knew a straight man, tells me he is now going to live as a WOMAN!?
(headexplode)
A guy who tells me that what I have is not worth having, who would give up his MALE PRIMACY to live as a female? I really don’t get that.
The odd thing is, neither do lots of lesbians or gay men; they struggle with the whole idea of being transgendered and try to explain it away. I’ve been told more than once that I should just admit I’m gay. If only.
Just one more layer.
Great point, Darya. You’re someone who’s willing to say not just the truth, but the whole truth.
I’ve always thought male homophobia was about hatred of women–you know, that faggot, that pussy, that sissy . . .
I like your breakdown of how some straight men may unconsciously perceive the situation–a good example of kyriarchy and how gender, orientation, etc intersect and affect each other.
I also just saw that and shared it.
I just saw the greatest Jay Bakker interview.
oh- so great….. John, if you could sticky that somhow it would be lovely….
A good one from the archives by the way. Thanks John for provoking yet more thought!
@ John Sutton: I completely agree with your assessment John. I am in the process of writing a second and third book, and in so doing I survey and interview many people, gay and straight alike. My data would support your thesis that indeed it is the “sexual picture” that is so frightening to straight people. Why that is I’ve never quite figured out, because I’ve been around gay people all my life, and I consider them to be friends, co-workers, acquaintences, team members or what ever. My wife feels as I do. Maybe I’m the strange one or the naive one, I don’t know, but I sense no threat; perceive no threat, and certainly am not the least bit concerned with someone else’s sexuality. We are on race on Planet Earth, and that is the Human Race.
And @ John Shore: You know my mantra by now: Christianity is NOT a Religion. To wear the mantle of Christian, means one follows the teachings of Jesus Christ. All 2026 words He was purported to have spoken in the main stream Gospels, and perhaps more in the Gnostics. To do so means that one therefore cannot discriminiate, exclude, be prejudiced toward, or bigotted toward any other member of humankind. To simply be “Religious”, implies that one may do any or all of the above in the name of Religion! (Think Westboro Baptist Church.) Therefore, in a literal sense it is NOT Christianity versus Homosexuality, rather it is RELIGION versus Homosexuality. This is a universal trait of “religion, the dogma of which entraps and enslaves humankind in ways never meant by the Creator. I think Ghandi said it best: “I love your Christ; I do not love your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Spoken by a man who is a darn sight more “Christian” than the bulk of us who wear the title!
My husband has the same opinion about religion that you do! So glad to hear from folks that believe the same as you do!
I don’t think this is about men living men, John. It’s about men having sex with men. That’s the picture they can’t get out of their heads. That’s what they ask us to abstain from.
That’s why kids get it! They don’t immediately focus on where my penis is, which straight men seem to do, for some reason. Instead, they see that my partner and I love each other and they just get it.
I agree with the basis of your argument, but it’s not about our love. If you’re talking about sex, say sex.
Dammit. The whole thrust of my response, shot in the first line.
That should say men loving men, of course.
@John Sutton, It works good both ways; men loving = men living.
Better yet; Humans loving = Humans living.
And vice versa; Humans living = Humans loving.
I don’t care who you love. I only hope that you love and are loved.
Mature, secure, reasonably intelligent people are not threatened. Those who are threatened simply are missing those qualities.
@ Jeff Blackshear, there is so much truth to that statement!
Homophobic men are afraid that gay men will view and treat them the way they (the homophobes) view and treat women. I think misogyny factors in quite heavily.
I think this makes a lot more sense than threats to the straight-male power base; homophobia is thousands of years old, after all.
Arthur Evans traces the rise of homophobia in the west back to the late Roman Empire, some hundreds of years before the Church existed; he points to a gradual shutting down of Greek and Roman traditions of pederasty (NOT the sexual abuse of small children, but the relationship between a teenage boy and his mentor including romance and even sex).
I admit I don’t know enough ancient history to be any more articulate than that. Does the history of misogyny look like a bell curve after all, the way the history of homophobia seems to?
You got here first, but that is EXACTLY what I’ve always said (‘cept you managed to be more concise than I usually do!). Thank you.
I feel sorry for people who are so filled with hate and fear that they want to stop other people from having happiness. One of my best friends is gay and he has been there for me more times than I can count. I can’t imagine my life without him in it.
Jason I am like you I don’t know why people worry about a gay person coming onto them. I had lesbian who is now a good friend hit on me when we first met. I was not upset or insulted. I just explained the same way I would to a guy hitting on me that I was not interested. I guess people who might get upset are worried that they are sending some kind of gay vibe out and that might mean gasp they have hidden homosexual desires.
Interesting take, John! I suppose, also, that in the wretched and life-hating religious fungelical communities from which gay-haters come, being gay is associated with intense SHAME and exclusion from the Great Celebration of Life. No wonder they hide it!
But a number of studies have proved that if a person is on friendly terms with a happy and well-adjusted gay person, they are far more likely to be well disposed towards gays and gay causes.
But, alas, they have to HIDE their orientation as best they can — even when they engage in gay sex. Look at the sad case of that poor, crazy pastor, Ted Haggard. What a story!
What astonishes me is that these homophobic “Christians” (like the Westboro Hate Cult) are so marinated in HATE. It must be terrible to live like that.
And only a *closeted* GAY man would persecute other gay men. Straight men are simply not interested in persecuting gays (unless they can make money out of it).
« 1 2 3