Last week I got in this letter:
Dear John,
I have a simple-minded question for you. It’s about abstinence from premarital sex. How does this work? No, not the “How do I resist temptation and remain pure?” part. Let’s say that your purity is completely assured. You have quenched your sexual thoughts and desires, and you have not done any sexual experimentation. You are saving your first kiss for marriage. Then, the day of your wedding, you go home to bed with your new husband, and … suddenly and automatically everything works?
I ask because for most of my adolescent and adult life I have been living the purity dream. I suppressed most of my sexual urges. No dating, no fantasizing, no touching. I was more or less asexual, and almost completely clueless. Then I fell in love with a fine young man, and we fully intend to marry each other once our life circumstances settle down. The young man and I started doing the things that young couples tend to do, like holding hands, or an arm around the shoulders or waist, and…I could not handle it. The feelings I had were either so overwhelming and powerful I had to stop, or I felt completely and totally numb.
I have needed ongoing therapy to get over this, but it is clear that for the present, even if the young man and I did get married, the two of us would not be able to have a sex life. The act of marriage would not be able to overcome the years of sexual dysfunction that I have imposed on myself. The young man, God bless him, loves me and wants to marry me anyway, even if this never changes, and even if that means we can never have biological children together.
I feel betrayed, because I did everything I was told with regard to abstinence, and it led me to a place where I wasn’t able to cope with sex at all and feel so broken. Is this how abstinence is supposed to work? I can’t think of anyone I could ask other than you, John, who would listen to me and take me seriously and give me an honest answer. Bless you for just reading this and getting this far.
Dear Young Woman:
Thanks for writing; I appreciate your trust.
Excuse the bluntness, but the short form of the blog demands it. So, well, to jump right in:
The whole Christian purity, “I’m saving myself for daddy” thing is insane. I won’t even go into the 1.6 million reasons why, but if you trust me at all, trust this: It’s as insane a thing as any culture, anywhere, has ever produced.
And it’s left you not knowing if (so to speak) you’re coming or going.
Here’s the truth of the dynamic with which you’re now involved: Your body has a consciousness at least as rich, complex, and immediate as the consciousness that comes out of your mind. Your misfortune is that you’ve severed yourself from that consciousness. That doesn’t mean that your body’s consciousness has ceased to exist; it just means that you’ve learned to ignore the vast amount of information it’s constantly producing. You did that because you learned that’s what God wants you to do. You learned that being a good girl for God and (I presume) for daddy means ignoring and ultimately mentally overriding your body’s consciousness. So that’s what you did.
You succeeded in making your mind the dictator of your body.
And now the time has come for your body to rebel against that oppressive regime.
Well, if you’re a dictator, and the body of people you rule over rises up against you, what do you do? Hopefully, you talk to the people. You find out what they want. You listen to their complaints. You learn of their needs, and then go about satisfactorily meeting them.
It’s time for your body to be listened to, is all. Your body now wants its rights to be recognized, acknowledged, legitimized. You just have to start tuning into what your body is now so desperately trying to communicate to you. So do that. Start, finally, taking advantage of the vast, fabulous, buzzy-good resource that is your body’s consciousness.
Wave good-bye to daddy. The lights of your Purity Ball have now been turned off. Time to ditch that paradigm of existence. It’s not like it’s going to start working for you. You’re not a little girl anymore. Daddy’s not going to be the man the woman in you needs. (And, please, consider the possibility that the person you really want in your bed is more of the mommy than daddy variety. Do yourself the favor of just considering the idea that you’re a lesbian. Millions of people are, so don’t trip about it. Just see if you are. Think about it. You’ll know.)
[Update triggered by commenter to this post suggesting that it sounds like I'm against maintaining one's virginity until marriage: I have serious issues with the whole "purity"/ "My heart belongs to daddy" phenomenon ---with the Purity Balls and Purity Vows and all that. I think that stuff is so tweaked I can barely believe it's legal. But I have no problem whatsoever with anyone, for whatever reasons they deem worthy, waiting until they are married to have sex.]
You need to start accessing your body’s wondrous, genius of a consciousness. You’ve been talking to your body for so long: issuing it decrees, repressing its freedoms, denying its right to freedom of expression. Now it’s time too, well …
Occupy your body!
Now it’s time to turn off your mind, and hear what your body has to say.
Prepare for one seriously engaging speech. Just sit back, and let the consciousness of your body take over. Before long you’ll find yourself wanting to take a long, hot bath by candlelight. You’ll want to stretch; a little yoga would be just the thing here. You’ll want to take long walks outside; you’ll want sun on your skin. You’ll want to have a glass of wine, and some delicious food. You’ll want to dance.
Do those things. Do all of them, and more.
At some point in this process (which you must allow to take as long as it must; remember: you’re following now, not leading) invite your boyfriend over. Share with him what you’re going through. See how he feels about it all. (And see also how you feel about him. Your letter tells me that a good deal of your problem might be that you’re simply not sexually attracted to your boyfriend. To be perfectly honest with you, the very first thought I had upon reading your letter was, “Oh, she’s a lesbian. And he’s gay.” Who but a gay man would be okay marrying a woman he can’t have sex with? And tons of Christian marriages are between a man and woman who don’t yet realize they’re gay. It’s so classic.)
You can do this. You can become the happily sexual person God made all of us to be. You just need to reestablish your relationship with half of what God gave you—what’s yours, and no one else’s. Not daddy’s. Not mommy’s. Yours.
It’s your body. Let it do for you what it’s so long been waiting to. Trust that God made you whole, and that your body has wisdom your mind can’t begin to conceive. Access that wisdom. It’s yours.
If anyone cares: How I Lost My Virginity to My High School Teacher.
Just out: UNFAIR: Why the “Christian” View of Gays Doesn’t Work (softcover edition; Kindle edition; NookBook edition). You’re invited to check out my Facebook page, and my group Unfundamentalist Christians, the motto of which is “Above all, love.”














{ 273 comments… read them below or add one }
← Older Comments
Spiritually, the evangelical message of purity seems to elevate abstinence to a level of salvation. Psychologically, the message teaches people to operantly condition themselves through self-punishment (calling your self sinful every time you experience sexual drives) to eliminate natural desires, yet parades the message as delayed gratification. From a sociological standpoint, it is wholly unfair to women who bear much of the burden and shame of such messages. And that’s because the message is heavily influenced by the practices of desert nomads whose virginal daughters aided business contracts and 18th century British aristocracy where a Victorian virginal bride dressed in white must have fetched the highest paying suitor…all while the Christian peasants were getting on fine with mutual consent, no bureaucratic registration, and little to no means for a fancy ceremony/party. As an aside, isn’t it interesting that for centuries, the behavior of regular Christian folk has been dictated not so much by God’s recorded words +the Holy Spirit, but rather by the power-hungry & often co-dependent relationship between clergy and aristocrats? Anyway, the purity-I-kissed-dating-goodbye-message is anachronistic. It sells its followers a message that you are too weak to recover from a break-up where sex was involved pre-maritally, but you can get over the emotional, financial, and sometimes physical trauma of a divorce that resulted from unmet fairy-tale expectations.
“Who but a gay man would be okay marrying a woman he can’t have sex with? And tons of Christian marriages are between a man and woman who don’t yet realize they’re gay. It’s so classic.)”
This is such an upsetting statement. This is everything that is wrong with the secular view of romance and sex; You are taking this man’s commitment and laughing at it, assuming that he is entirely driven by nothing but sexual desire. You are putting people below animals.
Imho she needs to complete her therapy before contemplating getting married to anybody. If her beau can wait for her, great. But she needs to find herself before she contemplates committing to being another person’s life partner.
Personally, I’m also bit shocked that this whole abstinence thing can leave a girl so out of touch with her own body that it denies her the opportunity for self-exploration / self-pleasuring, but then it always seemed a bit of a double standard in high school when it came to girls vs boys. As for that whole idea of sex is naughty / sex is good , there are plenty of Christian books that might help give her a healthier perspective (” A Celebration of Sex: A Guide to Enjoying God’s Gift of Sexual Intimacy”, comes to mind).
I pray that this woman someday reaches a point where she can softly quote May West to her chosen mate, saying with a sultry smile, “When I’m good, I’m good. But when I’m bad, I’m even better.” and then together be so happily naughty – it’s great!
Dear granddaughter in Christ,
You are right to feel betrayed, because you have been betrayed. I suggest ignoring the question of why you were betrayed as much as possible. I don’t think that will help you climb out of the pit you have been thrown in. After you’re out is time enough to consider that. You can’t figure out how the abstinence (of the type you mean) is supposed to work. That’s because it doesn’t work; never has; never will. You don’t lose your virginity when a man (or woman) kisses you. My wife and I were virgins when we married. But that only means she wouldn’t let my willy in. I had read one useful book on the subject when I was an undergraduate (someone in the fraternity house loaned it to me) and I honestly think that information about how to touch a woman may have changed my life. I learned that all parts of a woman are sensitive, not just some, and to pay very careful attention to her reactions when I touched her. You mention feeling overwhelming and powerful feelings when touched. That’s normal. But going completely numb is a common psychological defense against rape. This may mean your idea that you have fallen in love with a fine young man is not accurate. It might be (unintentional) self deception. Your overwhelming feelings when you are touched lead me to believe you are not asexual and never have been. Strong feelings are the gift of God. I cannot tell from your letter whether you need to stop because of fear of the strength of your feelings or because you find the toucher revolting. Here there is all the difference in the world. I think you might want to touch as many people as you can and most importantly, don’t suppress your fantasies. God gave them to you for a reason. They are not a mistake God made, you need them. From them you will learn who you are. And if the young man revolts you, you do him no favor by keeping him on a string.
So, you mean that historical linguists have spent centuries trying to figure out how language change happens, and this was it all along? But, you specifically said “people who know English.” Does it work this way for other languages as well?
Whoops, that was supposed to be a reply for the comments thread below.
← Older Comments