Occasioned by two comments he left on my blog, we last time discussed Chad Holtz’s recent return from Pure Life Ministries, where he had gone to live for seven months in order to be healed from his sexual addiction.
I find there are just a couple of things I want to say on this matter before it gets eclipsed by the Next Blog Post.
Firstly, all I personally need to know about Pure Life Ministries is found in this statement on their website:
We do not collect statistical data pertaining to the success rate of participants [in our live-in program]. However, based on Philippians 1:6, “He who has begun a good work in you will complete it,” we believe that the success rate is extremely high for the graduates of our program who are sincere.
There can only be one reason for PLM to maintain silence on the critical issue of how their graduates do once they’ve left their live-in program. It’s not like they haven’t the means to collect such data; they surely have all the contact information of their program participants. And if PLM did have a good after-program success rate, you can be certain they would crow about it—and deservedly so.
But they keep mum on that point. (Though not before making the reprehensible point that the failure of any graduate to on their own maintain the “pure life” can only be due to the moral failing—the insincerity—of that graduate.) That ringing silence means they know such data would discredit them. You can bet they’d use it otherwise. There’s only one reason for a kid to hide his report card.
And of course Pure Life fails in its mission. They’re no more prepared to heal sexual addiction than I am to perform open-heart surgery.
The three head counselors at PLM got their “Masters of Ministry in Biblical Counseling” from Master’s International School of Divinity. MISD is a “distance education school,” meaning it’s online only. (“At Master’s, you can drive to school via your computer. Your ministry education is only a keystroke away!”) And if you’re doubting MISD’s academic integrity, you’ll stop upon learning that one of its four “Academic Partnerships” is with the Institute for Creation Research. (“Biblical. Accurate. Certain.” is ICR’s motto.)
And gosh, look at that: not only did Pure Life’s President and Board Director, Director of Women’s Counseling, and Director of Men’s Counseling get their Master’s in Biblical Counseling from Master’s International School of Divinity, but so did PLM’s Founder and Chairman of the Board, Steve Gallagher.
What a coincidence!
It is, at least, until you learn that Steve Gallagher is on the faculty of the Master’s International School of Divinity.
And it doesn’t get better from there. The only qualifications of the Pure Life counselors assigned to each of the male live-in clients is that they themselves are graduates of the live-in program, and are “trained in biblical counseling.”
The only reason Pure Life “works” at all is because they’re selling what their customers have already bought. Their clients arrive toting the answer to their own problem. They already believe in Christ. They already think they’ve sinned against God. They already think Jesus is the answer to all their problems. They already think the Bible is the “supreme and all-sufficient Truth for overcoming sin.” What they desire is to hear, over and over again, in lots of different ways, what they already believe—while simultaneously hearing nothing else at all.
You spend twenty-four hours a day, for seven to nine months, having what you already believe constantly fed back to you? Then, yeah, afterwards that will be the only thing left in your mind and heart. You’ll be like a new car filled with that new car smell. And that smell is great! It’s wonderful! It fills the entire vehicle!
But then, inevitably, you start driving that car. And one day follow the next. And slowly but surely that new car smell fades. And then you’ve got yourself just a regular, everyday car.
Secondly, The Bible isn’t all you need to heal from sexual addiction (whatever “sexual addiction” actually means.) It can’t be. Expecting the Bible to be sufficient for curing sexual addiction is like expecting water to be sufficient for curing starvation. It doesn’t work that way. It’s not that easy. If it were, as a class Christians would be markedly more moral than any other group. But we’re not. We’re just people, struggling with the same things all people do.
The person compelled to act out in sexually inappropriate ways suffers from a psychological dysfunction. Literally or figuratively someone deep in their past (and we’re looking at you, Mom and/or Dad) royally screwed them. And thus did some of their wiring get scrambled. Some mechanism for self-negation got embedded within them that, as adults, they are compelled to try to exorcise through what ends up being inappropriate sexual behavior.
They’re trying to fix something that got broken. They’re trying to secure something primal that was denied to them.
They’re revisiting the scene of the crime, basically.
And that’s their problem. It’s unique to them. It has to do with their past, their parents, the way they were raised. It’s about all the intense, personal, intricate and exceptionally complex dynamics that informed their life. The Bible can’t address that. It has no apparatus for dealing with that. That’s not what the Bible is for.
God can give you the tools, but the work left to be done must be done by you alone. We all have to take out our own garbage. No one gets around that. No one gets to be the exception to that. No one has a different set of rules they get to play by. We’re all the same. We all have to deal with all the stuff in our past that someone responsible for us got terribly wrong, and which thereby became our unwieldy personal baggage.
Chad may, in fact, be delivered of his sexual addiction. We all hope that he is. But only those with working time machines can say whether he is. Right now all we know for sure is that when he left he didn’t believe in hell, and now he does; that he’s back with his wife and kids (yay!); and that five or so hours after I yesterday responded to his comment on my site he and his wife launched, via a blog apparently hastily thrown together, a new ministry of theirs founded upon their conviction that God wants them to share, for the benefit of others, the story of their victory over sexual addiction.
















{ 137 comments… read them below or add one }
« 1 2
I’m not sure how on-topic what I’m about to say is, but I remember at one point when I was developing as a person and as a Christian having my mother say to me that theology was trying to do much the same thing as physics – explaining to the best of our current level of understanding how the world around us actually works, and that it was focused on different parts of reality and using different tools.
But that first and foremost, it couldn’t be valid if it clearly and demonstrably contradicted the observable reality around us. Theology cannot validly be addressing an issue it’s getting wrong in the first place.
That doesn’t that faith cannot guide us in the fuzzy areas where we have no facts, but it cannot be Truth when it runs counter to the facts we do have.
I love what you wrote. Your Mom may have one of the most coherent and concise definitions of theology I’ve ever run across, including my years at Westmont and a brief hanging out at Fuller.
I may have to quote you on my FB page.
(The best explanation I ever got as a young person was that people needed something to do before brunch and Bloody Marys.)
For me, yeah, the church’s idea of ‘healing’ did me more harm than good. I was very naive when I entered the world of evangelicalism. I went for prayer counselling/healing. I was ‘delivered’ of my issues. I bowed to the ideals of getting married and having children because I thought that was how one was in the center of God’s will for their life.
I’m now married when I should have stayed single. I have children when I’ve no business being a mother. And those issues? Even worse now that they were never dealt with when they should have been. They were shoved aside to make room for trying to be a wife and mother and be ‘safe in the center of God’s will’. Those issues have festered and poisoned me yet I have to keep on keeping on.
Don’t mean to sound like such a downer! I just get my hackles up when people talk about healing through prayer and leaving it at that. Thanks for bringing this up, John! More people need to be open to both prayer AND psychotherapy.
No, no, what you’ve said isn’t a downer. It’s good to hear people figuring all this hard stuff out.
i’d be curious to hear what makes you feel as you shouldn’t be married, or why you have “no business being a mother.” Prob too personal stuff to share, but (for what it’s worth) as a spouse and parent, you’re certainly not alone in those sentiments.
Hmm. Well, what I can share is that my inner self is really screwed up and I was seriously ill equipped to get married. I’m sure lots people can look back and say that about getting married
But really, the dysfunction I grew up with sort of messed something up.
I was happy enough being single. I like being alone and always have. Relationships were just more than I could deal with but there was all this pressure to be in a godly relationship and have a godly life and make godly children. All the confessing and prayer and ‘healing’ caused me to believe I was whole and healthy and was following god’s will. Prior to being a christian I had never been in a relationship for more than 3 months. Then I married a guy because I thought god told me to.
As for being a mom- I have to spend so much time dealing with my inner turmoil it’s really hard to be there for my kids. I love them to bits but I have to work VERY VERY hard to try and be what they need. One of them needs be to be so much more than what I am, needs lots of hands on involvement and I find it quite difficult.
Life can be full of what if’s and I don’t live that way anymore. I’m a little more que sera sera about my choices, no matter how they came about. That’s a happy thing!
Does that make sense?
yes. Thanks for sharing it. Makes a LOT of sense.
Sorry to hear you sort of got “pressured” into marriage. I think sometimes the church struggles with “what do to” with single people.
It seems you’re on your way to being an amazing mother. Keep your head up.
How can these people get away with their fake science?! Being in cahoots with ICR proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that they should be kept far away from people who need real psychologists with real degrees from real universities. Without science these fundies would be performing excorcisms on cancer patients.
You know, I think you’re the first person in these comments to note the ICR partnership. How insane is that to use as your big-deal academic affiliation? It’s just unbelievable. It’s like looking on the menu of a restaurant and seeing that one of its proud business partners is a sewage disposal company.
It seems to me malpractice to say you can fix something which you are not trained to treat. Replacing unhealthy psychology with a different form of unhealthy psychology isn’t exactly what I would call recovery.
Exactly.
Meanwhile, a serious (and important) kerfuffle erupted last week in the Evangelical blogosphere. *Tirgger warning when reading the article.
(See: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/christianpiatt/2012/07/gospel-coalitions-views-on-gender-sex-arent-complementary/ ) It was regarding teachings that some complementarians put forth as the godly and righteous perspective on marriage and sex which includes dominating roles for men and submissive roles for women, even in bed. Unfortunately, to most of us egalitarians, it smacks of misogyny and is a primer on rape apologetics. It also enlightens a worldview that is based on authority and submission and reflects a belief system not only for a godly marriage but also for “God’s will” for society.
In the article the author of the referenced book, Douglas Wilson, writes: “This is of course offensive to all egalitarians…”
Yes. Yes it is.
I enjoy submitting. My brain is busy being superior all the time. I even feel ideas physically. When someone touches me, I’m allowed not to think. That’s why it’s so important that A. I trust who I’m reading, how I’m processing information, and B. I’m in a long-term relationship before I sleep someone. I’m just too vulnerable, otherwise. I’m not sure where that puts me on the complementarian/egalitarian scale.
Extra credit points for introducing BDSM on a Sunday morning. Christy, you are my platonic girl-crush forever.
Okay, fine. You don’t have to get on your knees and respectfully request it. I’ll do a series on BDSM.
Wait. No I won’t.
Oh my good golly God!
Please do this, John! It is so, so sorely needed!
Good recovery, John. PLEASE, for my sanity, DON’T.
LOL, for real.
So you guys want me to. Got it. Will do.
I love how you use sarcasm as an illustrative point.
Hey, Elizabeth! I just wanted to comment from my understanding of dominance and submission. The way I see it, you do indeed want/need to be submissive in any particular aspect of your life. That is you and how you enjoy life. Two people can be totally equal if they are both choosing how to live that out together. The issue with the idea that we’re SUPPOSED to live with men as dominant and women as submissive- be it sexually or in any other way- doesn’t take in to account any other way of being and forces people to go against their own core being.
I’ve seen relationships where the couple come from the ‘bible’ based idea that the husband is the head and the wife is the support. They are wonderful lovely people and they have an amazing relationship. They would seem to be poster children for that type of ‘biblical’ relationship working. But at the end of the day they are both totally wired in a way that this does, in fact, work. I have seen other couples MISERABLE trying to live this way. Either the woman is left feeling enslaved or the guy feels weak under the stress of having to be responsible for everything. For them it does not work no matter how hard they try. On the flip side I’ve seen couples where they are egalitarian but one half really wishes the other would have/take more control…
Sigh…if only we could all be reared to figure out our own selves instead of having every thing dictated to us.:)
Beautifully put. We must incinerate church dogma, peer pressure, and what we inherit in genetics and learned behavior from our parents. People who can reconcile all with someone they truly love are blessed.
*that
really good points, Amelia.
Thank you. I wasn’t going for points, but cool.
I suspect (though I could be wrong) you enjoy submitting so long as you know that if and or when you chose to say to your partner: “now I don’t enjoy submitting, and I would prefer X,” you had the full right and authority to do that…and your partner would listen and respect your wishes and/or you would be able to communicate wants, needs and desires and they would be valued and seen as equal to the wants, needs and desires of your partner. And I would presume most of us would prefer to have the right to refuse sex if your partner was interested and you were not.
Within some corners of this complementarian society, this is not a choice. And to go against the husband’s authority is categorized as having a “rebellious spirit” in need of repentance and the proper solution is to return to one’s assigned gender role of godly submission to the proscribed order of the universe which is, for them: men dominate and women submit – no questions asked.
So, from where I stand this is a form of theological BDSM since it is their perspective that this wifely submission to the husband in all things (How should I wear my hair? What do you like me to wear? Am I allowed to have a job outside the house? What kind of a job will you permit me to have? How many children would you like us to have?) reflects the “proper relationship” the believer is to have with God.
Since Jesus is reported to have said, “”The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to release the oppressed,” in Luke 4:18, I’m going to have to assume their exegesis is a little off and they just really enjoy the privilege of religiously sanctioned patriarchy.
And, Elizabeth, I hope you know any points from you are especially meaningful. So, I’m good with the crush.
I can’t speak at all about what these particular people say, but I know that a lot of the people who claim to “work with” homosexuality aren’t saying that they are treating the person at all – that they are simply helping the person reestablish a healthy relationship with God, and that it is God who will do all the healing. And of course, what right does any human have to say that God isn’t qualified to do anything God wants?
It’s a slick and circular way of covering all the bases. Luckily, it’s one that more an more people are seeing through, and that the legislative and legal systems are starting to deal with as well.
One of the things about Pure Life that I decided not to deal with was the video testimonies they have on their site relative to the “problem” of homosexuality. They’re a simply fascinating exercise in knowing exactly what to say–and what to not dare to. They walk that line as delicately as anything I’ve seen. It’s very clear PLM has learned to NEVER say anyone is ever cured of being gay. They insinuate the HECK out of–but never say it. They way they handle it is equal parts artful and repulsive.
« 1 2